16 Comments
User's avatar
Dan Star's avatar

So Discount Window requires Mark To Market whereas BTFP marks value at Par? If so, more F’ing inflation coming as we pick up the tab for yet another hidden bailout.

Expand full comment
JagerMario's avatar

Sounds like a $CBDC for banks?

Expand full comment
Mike's avatar

It doesn't matter. The uniparty socialist US government is repeating all the mistakes of the socialist regimes of Latin America. The Fed is sending a thinly disguised warning that a crisis is inevitable, make sure that the lifeboats are ready to launch. Rick Santelli's chart is prescient.

Expand full comment
K Andrew Serum's avatar

This all seems like the very legitimate behavior of a benevolent institution, yes. 🤦‍♂️

Expand full comment
Mike Agne's avatar

Great information in this post! The concentration of power is obvious considering the absolute dismantle of DoddFrank Section 165 as the top 2 banks now hold 53% of all deposits...so much for the 10% total deposit rule! The top 5% hold over 83%. Its obvious we have a National bank and 5 conduits.

Expand full comment
Justin Lillard's avatar

If this were to happen, what would be the likely consequences for the average middle-class American?

Expand full comment
Helen Mirth's avatar

Sergeant Schultz as Central bankers made me laugh out loud. Thanks!

Expand full comment
Thomas Richardson's avatar

If banks are forced to hold more capital, will this have the effect of creating some healthy banks?

Expand full comment
Andy Fately's avatar

It certainly does have the feel of an imminent crisis they are trying to avoid/prevent. Alas, as the crises get bigger, it becomes that much harder. could be a bumpy ride

Expand full comment
Jim F's avatar

"Every depository institution is set up to borrow from the discount window by virtue of participation in the Federal Reserve System."

Are they really? If a bank needs to access the discount window in an emergency, but hasn't done so in the past, are they prepared to quickly do so, or would some "practice" be of value?

You quickly "hand-waved" away the Fed's reasoning on this issue, so I'm not sure if I'm ready to believe your argument.

Expand full comment
Gerry with a G's avatar

So if they're going to douse the problem with liquidy liquidity, the stonk market will steadily go up for the next ten years?...Like the decade of 0% interest rates

Expand full comment
TheXproject Guy's avatar

Great article, and it is a perfect example of U.S. policymakers doing whatever it takes to keep the system afloat as discussed in The X Project’s latest article:

https://thexproject.substack.com/p/dont-miss-the-forest-for-the-trees-beb

Expand full comment
NYUGrad's avatar

They are pitching it as a firedrill. Tap the discount window once per yr so your bank knows how to, so that you all dont panic without the btfp.

Expand full comment
Brett Richards's avatar

Good idea! It makes sense that the mechanics of borrowing money would be foreign to a bank.

Expand full comment
NYUGrad's avatar

Its ridiculous. They are saying SVB didnt know how to. Thus the bailout and btfp program. And that if SVB knew how to, then it might not have blew up. This is the world we live in

Expand full comment
Helen Mirth's avatar

Hahaha

Expand full comment